Diversity in Tech

Big Red Car here on a lovely, sunny, mild Texas day. Ahhh, on Earth as it is in Texas.

So, the tech world loves the word “diversity.” Diversity is the inclusion in a community of individuals representing multiple viewpoints based on gender, ethnicity, national origin, age, sexual orientation, religion, socioeconomic status, politics, and philosophy. Whew! [There may be more. I didn’t mention pets. There is a world of tension between cat people and dog people. I will ignore that for now.]

The tech world has done a good job of “talking the talk” as it relates to gender, sexual orientation, and ethnicity/national origin. This is the self-congratulatory view of tech when they get to hold the mirror up to themselves.

Much of what tech applauds itself for is very much a work in progress. On the issue of gender, as an example, there are still VC firms which have a single female partner who has been there for half an hour. One of my pet peeves is the VC firm who preaches diversity, virtue signals its wholesale support, and who has not a single woman in its partners pic. Come on. Stop being such hypocrites.

Some would say that tech has failed miserably embracing diversity amongst age, religion, politics, and philosophy. God, they are like a gulag when it comes to age discrimination. The old folks are sent to Siberia.

Big Red Car, any proof?

Well, yes, dear reader, there is some proof of this. Let’s take the issue of political orientation, shall we?

Here is a link to a video which was recorded at a Google TGIF meeting. Take a look.

Google Pity Party Video

What one leaves with is the pervasive sense that the failure of Hillary Clinton to win the election is a tragedy beyond comprehension. The first speaker, Sergey Brin, is a co-founder of Google. As a person in that powerful position, he is sending a clear message – the company is not a welcoming environment for any viewpoint that does not conform to his.

This message is driven home by the litany of similarly thinking members of senior management. Note the funereal tone of the Chief Financial Officer.

No, her dog did not die. She is likely a cat person.

So, the question is – If you were a conservative and felt happy at the election results, would you feel that the company was receptive to your political views or philosophy or would you feel as if the environment was toxic and harsh?

Similarly, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey was testifying on the Hill to Congress about the culture of Twitter amongst a number of other things. Without prodding, he volunteered the following nugget in a subsequent interview:

“. . . we have a lot of conservative-leaning folks in the company as well, and to be honest, they don’t feel safe to express their opinions at the company.”

 

OK, just for the record, I don’t buy the “we have lots of conservative-leaning folks” shtick. Just me.

The comments by Dorsey – who I think is a genius – are troubling because they impinge on free speech. Can you imagine working for a company where your political views would be opposed by the entire culture as a living organism? Can you imagine a CEO allowing such a toxic culture to grow unabated?

Jack, it’s the Big Red Car. Do SOMETHING. You’re the guy in charge. You are the main stirrer of the culture pot. Put some healthy probiotic organisms into the soup. Please?

Free speech, bias

So what, Big Red Car? It’s just a thing in Silicon Valley, right?

No, dear reader, as SV tech goes goes all tech. Everybody wants to be Jack when they grow up (or Sergey). They are role models. [Just for the record, Jack used to actually be a male model. Haha. Shut up, Big Red Car.]

In addition, this is an impingement of free speech, a Constitutionally protected right of every citizen. [OK, let’s keep it real. This is NOT a Constitutional crisis.]

It is also the spring from which anti-conservative political bias flows. Bias, per Peter Strzok, is OK as long as you don’t act on it. Haha, sorry. I just find that kind of nonsense so funny.

Of course, everybody acts on their biases. I love pistachio ice cream. I adore pistachio ice cream. I am biased in favor of pistachio ice cream. I buy and eat pistachio ice cream. I couldn’t fail to act on that bias if paid to do so.

So, there you have it, dear reader. Tech talks a good game, but when it comes to providing diversity of philosophy, politics, views – they get an F. No, an F minus.

F – <<< talking to you, Google and Twitter

But, hey, what the Hell do I really know anyway? I’m just a Big Red Car. Have a great week and be your best embraceable you.