And to borrow from General H. Schwarzkopf, “Other than that, she’s a great leader. I want you to know that”.

I doubt that she’s much able to get much done much above, say, writing some little popular book. I fear for what she would do if she could.

I can’t see just why she bothers now: She’s got money enough. I mean, why go to all the trouble to lie, deceive, do political mud wrestling, without accomplishing anything real? Got to be some wires crossed someplace. She’d be better off organizing a course on real politics and giving it somewhere as an adjunct prof of polysci or modern history.

And I’d like to understand just what it is about the system that let her just go around giving some speeches and ending up with some tens of millions, IIRC $30 million. Somehow I have to suspect that the people were paying for something other than some routine speeches.

.
Hillary is not a real leader. She screwed up Hillarycare. Never got it to the finish line.

She was completely undistinguished as a legislator.

Her stint at State, an attempt by Obama to castrate her, was a disaster as the Middle East and Russia clearly shows. She could not have been worse.

On a personal basis, she attracts henchpersons not followers (around her). Those around her are low level grifters themselves. They are in it for the power and the money.

What she is is an incredible hustler who shook the money tree to make her and Bill fabulously wealthy.

She is also the best “victim” exemplar in the history of the world.

A woman of accomplishment? Other than being tough as a boot at a Congressional witch burning, no.

A corrupt money grubber and grifter? Without equal!

BRC
http://www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com

How would a Lt. Hillary do trying to lead soldiers into battle? Sorry, wrong question: Since as just a lieutenant, she’d know the might get killed, she wouldn’t. But, what about Captain Hillary and battle? Hmm ….

You are correct: She’s bright. She knows the game and the players really well.

Ambitious? Determined? Deceptive? Manipulative? Cynical? Nasty? Yup..

Cute when she was in college? Yup.

Angry? Likely.

Meek, sweet, darling, adorable, precious, sugar and spice and everything nice, lovable, believable, trustworthy, a good role model for girls, someone we should be proud of as a citizen and leader, someone we should want as POTUS? Nope.

She was elected as a US Senator and appointed as US Secretary of State — just what is it about our political system that lets such a person get to such high office?

My guess: The mainstream media (MSM) needs revenue from ads from eyeballs from smelly bait so pumps out a continuing stream of efforts to scare the readers with lots of threats. Then, somehow it’s natural for the MSM to present as solutions to these threats Big Brother big government
and, then, nearly automatically, the Democrats, without question or doubt, the Democrats, and, there, in response to much of the scare tactics, politically correct Big Brother Democrat solutions. So, the MSM is just totally in the tank for the Democrats and doesn’t provide information
so that good citizens can monitor Democrat government, e.g., the claim of the video clip. So, without good monitoring, we get really sloppy Democrat government, and, again, the MSM, totally in the tank, doesn’t report the sloppy nonsense.

My hope for a solution: Exploitation of the Internet.

The Republicans may have made her President.

BRC
http://www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com