<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Trump&#8217;s Secret Weapon &#8212; Melania	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/trumps-secret-weapon-melania/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/trumps-secret-weapon-melania/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=trumps-secret-weapon-melania</link>
	<description>53 years and 204,000 miles of business, CEO, leadership, startup, political, military wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 21:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.11</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: sigmaalgebra		</title>
		<link>https://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/trumps-secret-weapon-melania/#comment-2499</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sigmaalgebra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/?p=4662#comment-2499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt; Very cheesy.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yup.

From all I can see, and I&#039;m much better seeing now than some years ago, she is a total sweetheart.  I hate to see kittens, puppies, girls, princesses, angels, and total sweethearts hurt.  So, I believe that we should be sweet to a total sweetheart.  In particular, it would be gauche, and don&#039;t need to know much French for that, to be in any way, let me find a word, right, cheesy about her.  Moreover, I have to believe that her husband, to make the understatement of this whole millennium, would be, to find another word, right, protective toward her.

I believe that we can all be enormously proud to have her as our First Lady and want to be as nice to her as possible.  E.g., if she shows some hints of preferring to be somewhat private, not unusual for a total sweetheart, then we should respect and honor that.

To crack a joke, but, still, to illustrate, emphasize, and be more clear, one way to solve the ISIS problem:  Have a video of some filthy Abdul Akbar al Fatwah ali Jihad bin Boom Boom dirt bag hint, even just a little hint, maybe even a bit ambiguous, about her.  Then, all in 30 minutes, to borrow from the first movie &lt;i&gt;Indiana Jones,&lt;/i&gt; the whole &quot;desert wiped clean by the wrath of &quot; her husband and Commander in Chief.  Boom Boom and his bro buddies all get their magic carpet ride, and we get a totally clean desert and no more &lt;i&gt;inappropriates&lt;/i&gt; about a total sweetheart and USA First Lady.

Newsies:  Be careful, very careful, very, very careful what the heck you say, write, or hint about her.  Did I mention careful?  Do you remember her husband&#039;s 10X remark?  Maybe that was not fully accurate in all cases:  About his wife, maybe he meant exp(10)X.  Want to test him out on that one, make sure it isn&#039;t exp(exp(20))X?  Use your grade school arithmetic to estimate exp(exp(20))X and then think again.  Hint:  For exp(10), Google says 22,026.465,794,8.  Compare exp(exp(20))X to that light little tap the earth got in Mexico from some little rock from space 65 million years ago.  I could be wrong -- consider also exp(exp(20!))X

She&#039;s a total sweetheart.  Newsies, I&#039;ve got just two words for you to remember -- &lt;i&gt;total sweetheart&lt;/i&gt;.  You can remember just two words, right?  Forgetting those two words stands to be a total career decision.  Don&#039;t forget those two words.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Very cheesy.  </p></blockquote>
<p>Yup.</p>
<p>From all I can see, and I&#8217;m much better seeing now than some years ago, she is a total sweetheart.  I hate to see kittens, puppies, girls, princesses, angels, and total sweethearts hurt.  So, I believe that we should be sweet to a total sweetheart.  In particular, it would be gauche, and don&#8217;t need to know much French for that, to be in any way, let me find a word, right, cheesy about her.  Moreover, I have to believe that her husband, to make the understatement of this whole millennium, would be, to find another word, right, protective toward her.</p>
<p>I believe that we can all be enormously proud to have her as our First Lady and want to be as nice to her as possible.  E.g., if she shows some hints of preferring to be somewhat private, not unusual for a total sweetheart, then we should respect and honor that.</p>
<p>To crack a joke, but, still, to illustrate, emphasize, and be more clear, one way to solve the ISIS problem:  Have a video of some filthy Abdul Akbar al Fatwah ali Jihad bin Boom Boom dirt bag hint, even just a little hint, maybe even a bit ambiguous, about her.  Then, all in 30 minutes, to borrow from the first movie <i>Indiana Jones,</i> the whole &#8220;desert wiped clean by the wrath of &#8221; her husband and Commander in Chief.  Boom Boom and his bro buddies all get their magic carpet ride, and we get a totally clean desert and no more <i>inappropriates</i> about a total sweetheart and USA First Lady.</p>
<p>Newsies:  Be careful, very careful, very, very careful what the heck you say, write, or hint about her.  Did I mention careful?  Do you remember her husband&#8217;s 10X remark?  Maybe that was not fully accurate in all cases:  About his wife, maybe he meant exp(10)X.  Want to test him out on that one, make sure it isn&#8217;t exp(exp(20))X?  Use your grade school arithmetic to estimate exp(exp(20))X and then think again.  Hint:  For exp(10), Google says 22,026.465,794,8.  Compare exp(exp(20))X to that light little tap the earth got in Mexico from some little rock from space 65 million years ago.  I could be wrong &#8212; consider also exp(exp(20!))X</p>
<p>She&#8217;s a total sweetheart.  Newsies, I&#8217;ve got just two words for you to remember &#8212; <i>total sweetheart</i>.  You can remember just two words, right?  Forgetting those two words stands to be a total career decision.  Don&#8217;t forget those two words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JLM		</title>
		<link>https://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/trumps-secret-weapon-melania/#comment-2495</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JLM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/?p=4662#comment-2495</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[.

In the cage match between spouses, who do YOU favor? Bill Clinton or Melania Trump?

Who is that mystery woman who captured The Donald?

http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/trumps-secret-weapon-melania/



Read about her here.


I favor the 5&#039;11&quot; girl with the architecture degree, the five languages, and the big ......................................................  rock. Just me.


BRC
www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
<p>In the cage match between spouses, who do YOU favor? Bill Clinton or Melania Trump?</p>
<p>Who is that mystery woman who captured The Donald?</p>
<p><a href="http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/trumps-secret-weapon-melania/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/trumps-secret-weapon-melania/</a></p>
<p>Read about her here.</p>
<p>I favor the 5&#8217;11&#8221; girl with the architecture degree, the five languages, and the big &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;  rock. Just me.</p>
<p>BRC<br />
<a href="http://www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
