Military Diversity and Inclusion Is NOT a National Security Issue

Recently the Secretary of Defense Lloyd J Austin III (a former General and West Point gradate) made comments indicating the current status of diversity and inclusion in the American military at the general officer strata rises to the level of a “national security risk.”

In the military when they want to scare the civilians or they want to suggest that something rises to a level such that America might not win a war, they call it a “readiness risk.”

This picture is for all you West Pointers, you ring knockers. Note Sec Def Austin and his WP ring. It is an Army thing.

Sec of Def Austin’s comments were expounded upon by a speech Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Mark Milley made wherein he stated that currently the military had two black generals amongst a total of forty-one whilst the military is twenty percent black [against a back drop of the American citizenry being 13.4% black].

General Milley also characterized this situation as a “readiness risk.”

What’s the sitch again, Big Red Car?

Let’s reiterate the SITUATION:

 1. The US military has 2 black Generals (meaning 4-star Generals).

Brigadier Generals >>> Major Generals >>> Lieutenant Generals >>> Generals. One star, two stars, three stars, four stars.

 2. The US military has 41 Generals.

 3. The military is 20% black.

If 20% of the 41 Generals were black, this would be 8.2 black Generals, a shortfall of 6.2 black Generals.

 4. America is 13.4% black.

If 13.4% of the 41 Generals were black, this would be 5.5 black Generals, a shortfall of 3.5 black Generals.

Readiness issue, Big Red Car?

This fact pattern above is what motivates our Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to suggest that we have a “readiness issue” meaning we might not prevail in a future war.

Pentagon spokesman former Admiral John Kirby added to the discussion by noting Secretary of Defense Austin “strongly believes that diversity is a readiness issue because it allows different perspectives, additional context, different lived experiences to inform the way we make decisions and the policies that we craft, the operations that we lead.”

The nurturing, care, and feeding of generals

Fighting your way to the top in the Army is the ultimate political meritocracy. Nobody gets there easily. It is a torture test and uber competitive. Surprised? Of course not.

A general’s career includes a slew of schools and additional education, typically looking something like this:

 1. Branch basic course, such as Infantry Officer Basic Course

 2. Airborne and Ranger Schools

 3. Company command course and/or branch advanced course; maybe at a foreign country’s school

 4. Command and General Staff College

 5. Branch War College

 6. Graduate school — former Gen David Petraeus studied at Princeton receiving a doctorate

It is a very fierce educational progression and our generals are extraordinary in knowledge of their art.

Generals are groomed by assignment also. Typically something like this:

 1. Platoon, company, battalion, brigade, assistant division commander, division commander, corps commander, major combatant commander (like a theater commander such as the entire Middle East)

 2. Interspersed between the above command assignments will be staff jobs and other important touchstones like teaching at West Point, an aide-de-camp to a high ranking general, a White House Fellowship — we used to call this getting one’s “ticket punched”

As the future general’s career evolves, he will receive OERS (Officer Efficiency Reports) that are the critical performance appraisal tool in the military. To become a general, one has to be a fire breather, well educated, top performer, a good staff officer, and have flawless OERs.

Combat assignment OERs are particularly important.

Calling bullshit on the issue of readiness

Given the difficult path that any General will travel to attain that lofty perch, I call bullshit on the notion that America’s fate in its next war is called into question because we seem to be 3.5 – 6.2 black Generals short under current thinking.

Any General, given the nature of the development path they have followed, is going to be an extraordinary performer with approximately 30 years of soldiering under his belt.

It is simply NOT a readiness risk. Sorry.

Bottom line it, Big Red Car

Fine, we are being asked to suspend our common sense, skepticism, and credulity in order to embrace a nonsensical, formulaic approach to a woke racial distribution amongst General officers. The. Sky. Is. Falling.

Will the Army or Navy be any less capable to fight because we have a 3.5 black General shortfall from some idealized allocation? No.

Why not? Because all 4-star Generals are picked by a meritocracy and they will all be fine.

So, Big Red Car what is your problem?

I am perfectly fine with the American military managing its staffing to reflect the racial makeup of the population, but for God’s sake don’t tell us that it is a “readiness issue,” one that may doom America to losing the next war because our racial mix was off.

Just shoot straight with us, the American people, and, please, God, stop blowing smoke up our collective asses. Thanks.

But, hey, what the Hell do I really know anyway? I’m just a Big Red Car.

General Mark Milley, please develop talent as you desire in the US military, but don’t tell us it’s a readiness issue and that it may impact the outcome of our next war