<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Decision Memorandum	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/decision-memorandum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/decision-memorandum/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=decision-memorandum</link>
	<description>53 years and 204,000 miles of business, CEO, leadership, startup, political, military wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.12</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: sigmaalgebra		</title>
		<link>https://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/decision-memorandum/#comment-3030</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sigmaalgebra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/?p=5214#comment-3030</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For the importance of getting the CFO,
etc. to sign in blood, it appears that
there are some inexplicit assumptions.  I
outline three possibilities:

(1) CEO Centered.

The BoD holds the CEO responsible for the
decision and, more important, its results.

There the BoD accepts that the CEO
will/may use information, analyses,
recommendations, etc. from the CFO, any or
all of the C-suite, some analyst on the
staff of the CEO or CFO, anyone in the
organization, outside consultants, advice
of the BoD, etc. but still holds the CEO
responsible for the results of the
decision, no matter what advice he (she
here and below) got.

In this case, for the BoD having the CFO
and the rest of the C-suite sign off on
the decision in blood is irrelevant.

(2) CFO Centered.

The BoD assumes that the CEO hired the CFO
to be the source of expertise on
everything financial.  The CEO is no more
supposed to question the judgment of the
CFO than he would that of, say, a board
certified heart surgeon.  Or, the CFO is a
&lt;i&gt;professional&lt;/i&gt; with the expertise and
professional responsibility to make sound
decisions.

In this case, the BoD will look to the
CFO.  If the CFO signed his recommendation
on the decision and the CEO accepted it
and did at least a good job with the
implementation and execution of the CFO&#039;s
recommendation, then the BoD would hold
the CEO blameless.

If the CFO&#039;s recommendations often don&#039;t
work, then the BoD might expect the CEO to
get a new CFO.

(3) C-Suite Consensus Centered.

The BoD accepts that no one person can bat
1000 on such decisions, that business
experience, judgment, intuition, acumen,
etc. can be important, and wants the CEO
to have made good use of at least the
C-suite and maybe more and achieved a
consensus.

Then the BoD wants to see the decision
signed by all the more qualified persons
who were part of the consensus.

At least for the first poor decision, the
BoD will hold the CEO responsible not so
much for the actual results of the
decision but for the decision making
&lt;i&gt;process&lt;/i&gt; and, as usual, the
implementation, execution of the decision.

So, of (1)-(3), what is the real story;
according to the BoD norms, which of
(1)-(3) will the BoD want and accept?

Or, maybe, the real norms are vague and
the real situation is simpler:  If the
results are poor, then everyone on the BoD
gets a free pass; the CEO will be in the
center on the gallows; and there will be
plenty of room on the gallows for any and
all others in the company who were
significantly involved.

Then, should the CEO try to involve
members of the BoD in formulating the
decision?  I&#039;m guessing no:

Why?  Suppose a member of the BoD gives a
recommendation.  If the CEO takes the
recommendation and the results are good,
then the BoD member can take a lot of the
credit.  If the results are bad, then the
CEO gets all the blame.  If the CEO does
not take the recommendation, then that is
a strike against the CEO no matter what
the results.  So, for the CEO to ask a
member of the BoD is for the CEO a
lose-lose-lose situation.

Or from

&quot;Shop Talk — Boards, A Pragmatic
Checklist&quot;, Posted on February 4, 2016 by
Big Red Car

at

http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/shop-talk-boards-a-pragmatic-checklist/#more-4839

are

&lt;blockquote&gt;___21.  Make sure that you
discriminate among management, investor,
and independent Directors.

Have an Independent Directors meeting
before the Board meeting.  The Independent
Directors should be the CEO’s most loyal
supporters.  Make it so.

This is, perhaps,the most overlooked
element of the care and feeding of Boards.

___22.  Never, ever confide your personal
challenges to a Board member.  Do not
confide in people who can fire you.

Get a CEO coach and be unafraid to cry on
the phone.  Get someone who has been a CEO
so they are not taken aback by the crying.
You will do it, trust me.  Being a CEO is
hard work.

___23.  When dealing with a Board remember
that they will hire you as the CEO and
they will fire you.  It is their primary
duty.

Remember, at all times, you are dealing
with people who WILL fire you.

Eighty percent of VC funded companies
replace their CEO in the first four years.
Know this and act accordingly.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Net, don&#039;t confide in, don&#039;t brainstorm
with, don&#039;t discuss details with, don&#039;t
show thoughts in progress to, and don&#039;t
ask advice from members of the BoD, at
least not the non-independent members.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the importance of getting the CFO,<br />
etc. to sign in blood, it appears that<br />
there are some inexplicit assumptions.  I<br />
outline three possibilities:</p>
<p>(1) CEO Centered.</p>
<p>The BoD holds the CEO responsible for the<br />
decision and, more important, its results.</p>
<p>There the BoD accepts that the CEO<br />
will/may use information, analyses,<br />
recommendations, etc. from the CFO, any or<br />
all of the C-suite, some analyst on the<br />
staff of the CEO or CFO, anyone in the<br />
organization, outside consultants, advice<br />
of the BoD, etc. but still holds the CEO<br />
responsible for the results of the<br />
decision, no matter what advice he (she<br />
here and below) got.</p>
<p>In this case, for the BoD having the CFO<br />
and the rest of the C-suite sign off on<br />
the decision in blood is irrelevant.</p>
<p>(2) CFO Centered.</p>
<p>The BoD assumes that the CEO hired the CFO<br />
to be the source of expertise on<br />
everything financial.  The CEO is no more<br />
supposed to question the judgment of the<br />
CFO than he would that of, say, a board<br />
certified heart surgeon.  Or, the CFO is a<br />
<i>professional</i> with the expertise and<br />
professional responsibility to make sound<br />
decisions.</p>
<p>In this case, the BoD will look to the<br />
CFO.  If the CFO signed his recommendation<br />
on the decision and the CEO accepted it<br />
and did at least a good job with the<br />
implementation and execution of the CFO&#8217;s<br />
recommendation, then the BoD would hold<br />
the CEO blameless.</p>
<p>If the CFO&#8217;s recommendations often don&#8217;t<br />
work, then the BoD might expect the CEO to<br />
get a new CFO.</p>
<p>(3) C-Suite Consensus Centered.</p>
<p>The BoD accepts that no one person can bat<br />
1000 on such decisions, that business<br />
experience, judgment, intuition, acumen,<br />
etc. can be important, and wants the CEO<br />
to have made good use of at least the<br />
C-suite and maybe more and achieved a<br />
consensus.</p>
<p>Then the BoD wants to see the decision<br />
signed by all the more qualified persons<br />
who were part of the consensus.</p>
<p>At least for the first poor decision, the<br />
BoD will hold the CEO responsible not so<br />
much for the actual results of the<br />
decision but for the decision making<br />
<i>process</i> and, as usual, the<br />
implementation, execution of the decision.</p>
<p>So, of (1)-(3), what is the real story;<br />
according to the BoD norms, which of<br />
(1)-(3) will the BoD want and accept?</p>
<p>Or, maybe, the real norms are vague and<br />
the real situation is simpler:  If the<br />
results are poor, then everyone on the BoD<br />
gets a free pass; the CEO will be in the<br />
center on the gallows; and there will be<br />
plenty of room on the gallows for any and<br />
all others in the company who were<br />
significantly involved.</p>
<p>Then, should the CEO try to involve<br />
members of the BoD in formulating the<br />
decision?  I&#8217;m guessing no:</p>
<p>Why?  Suppose a member of the BoD gives a<br />
recommendation.  If the CEO takes the<br />
recommendation and the results are good,<br />
then the BoD member can take a lot of the<br />
credit.  If the results are bad, then the<br />
CEO gets all the blame.  If the CEO does<br />
not take the recommendation, then that is<br />
a strike against the CEO no matter what<br />
the results.  So, for the CEO to ask a<br />
member of the BoD is for the CEO a<br />
lose-lose-lose situation.</p>
<p>Or from</p>
<p>&#8220;Shop Talk — Boards, A Pragmatic<br />
Checklist&#8221;, Posted on February 4, 2016 by<br />
Big Red Car</p>
<p>at</p>
<p><a href="http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/shop-talk-boards-a-pragmatic-checklist/#more-4839" rel="nofollow ugc">http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/shop-talk-boards-a-pragmatic-checklist/#more-4839</a></p>
<p>are</p>
<blockquote><p>___21.  Make sure that you<br />
discriminate among management, investor,<br />
and independent Directors.</p>
<p>Have an Independent Directors meeting<br />
before the Board meeting.  The Independent<br />
Directors should be the CEO’s most loyal<br />
supporters.  Make it so.</p>
<p>This is, perhaps,the most overlooked<br />
element of the care and feeding of Boards.</p>
<p>___22.  Never, ever confide your personal<br />
challenges to a Board member.  Do not<br />
confide in people who can fire you.</p>
<p>Get a CEO coach and be unafraid to cry on<br />
the phone.  Get someone who has been a CEO<br />
so they are not taken aback by the crying.<br />
You will do it, trust me.  Being a CEO is<br />
hard work.</p>
<p>___23.  When dealing with a Board remember<br />
that they will hire you as the CEO and<br />
they will fire you.  It is their primary<br />
duty.</p>
<p>Remember, at all times, you are dealing<br />
with people who WILL fire you.</p>
<p>Eighty percent of VC funded companies<br />
replace their CEO in the first four years.<br />
Know this and act accordingly.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Net, don&#8217;t confide in, don&#8217;t brainstorm<br />
with, don&#8217;t discuss details with, don&#8217;t<br />
show thoughts in progress to, and don&#8217;t<br />
ask advice from members of the BoD, at<br />
least not the non-independent members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JLM		</title>
		<link>https://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/decision-memorandum/#comment-3028</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JLM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/?p=5214#comment-3028</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/decision-memorandum/#comment-3027&quot;&gt;pointsnfigures&lt;/a&gt;.

.
Willis is definitely a demi-god.

BRC
www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/decision-memorandum/#comment-3027">pointsnfigures</a>.</p>
<p>.<br />
Willis is definitely a demi-god.</p>
<p>BRC<br />
<a href="http://www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pointsnfigures		</title>
		<link>https://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/decision-memorandum/#comment-3027</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pointsnfigures]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/?p=5214#comment-3027</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[gonna say you need more than sunscreen today.  People in Texas ought to take pictures of Jesus out of their churches and install pictures of Willis Carrier: http://www.carrier.com/carrier/en/us/about-us/willis-carrier/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gonna say you need more than sunscreen today.  People in Texas ought to take pictures of Jesus out of their churches and install pictures of Willis Carrier: <a href="http://www.carrier.com/carrier/en/us/about-us/willis-carrier/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.carrier.com/carrier/en/us/about-us/willis-carrier/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JLM		</title>
		<link>https://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/decision-memorandum/#comment-3026</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JLM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/?p=5214#comment-3026</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[.
The Decision Memorandum is a good way to standardize decisionmaking between a CEO and her Board of Directors. It is a useful and efficient tool. And why not?

http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/decision-memorandum/

BRC
www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.<br />
The Decision Memorandum is a good way to standardize decisionmaking between a CEO and her Board of Directors. It is a useful and efficient tool. And why not?</p>
<p><a href="http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/decision-memorandum/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://themusingsofthebigredcar.com/decision-memorandum/</a></p>
<p>BRC<br />
<a href="http://www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
